The Uncensored Letters of a Canteen Girl — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
The Uncensored Letters of a Canteen Girl — A Closer Reading can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 100,926 words, 7 hr 19 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 17.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
isoners,” and when you meet a file of guard-house habitués escorted by a rifle in the rear, it is invariably the guard, and not the prisoners, who looks the culprit! The interest of Bruno’s visits lies largely in seeing what is his latest acquisition in the way of jewelry. For Bruno has a pretty taste for finery and enlivens the dull evenings of his captivity by winning away the ornaments of his fellow prisoners. Already he has come into the canteen decked out with seven large rings and a fat watch and chain. Today he appeared with his latest prize, a pair of gold-rimmed eye glasses. They are hideously unbecoming, they pinch his nose so that it hurts, moreover he can’t more than half see out of them, and yet it is quite evident those eyeglasses are the pride of his heart.
Last week our Secretary conceived a big idea. He would educate A Company. He would teach them to read, write and speak English. He started a class. On the first night there was a large crowd, eager and interested; the second night there were six, the pupils when sought out complaining they were “tired” or “busy;” the third night there was Saint Mary who made one; the fourth night the class died an easy death. I am afraid Company A is going to continue uneducated. As Brady said:
“There were just two things I learned in school; one was to throw a spit ball, the other was to bend a pin convenient for somebody to sit on.” And it looks as if it would have to go at that.
“Why, those birds don’t even understand their own names,” complain the officers; “except on payday, and then they’ll answer no matter _how_ you pronounce them.”
Bourmont, December 9.
There is something queer about me. I don’t mind the mud, I don’t mind the rain, I don’t mind the hill, I don’t even mind the mess. Of course I admit that the food isn’t quite what one is used to, and the surroundings are a trifle unsavoury, but it is, after all, so much better than the state of semi-starvation that I was led to half anticipate, that I for one am quite content.
Our mess is held at the house of an old couple who live a little way above our billet on the hill. The house was differentiated from the others in the row by a spindling and discouraged tree which stood in a green tub outside; as this was the only tree in front of a house on the whole street it has always been easy to pick out our otherwise undistinguished entrance. Last night however, the weather waxing colder, the tree moved indoors. This morning the whole Y. personnel wandered distractedly up and down the hill trying to identify the mess-house door, until some kindly villagers, sensing the situation, came out on their front steps and pointed us to the place.
The house, like most of the village dwellings, consists, downstairs, of just two rooms. In the front room the family cooks, eats and spends its days. In the back room the family sleeps, and here we have our mess. The drawback of this arrangement is that one has to pass through the kitchen in order to reach the dining-room and this is likely to spoil one’s pleasure in the meal that follows. As for me, I go on the principle that what one doesn’t know won’t take one’s appetite away, and so hurry through the kitchen with one eye shut and the other fixed on the door ahead of me.
Said my right-hand neighbor to my left-hand neighbor at supper the other day, as he offered him the _pièce de résistance_ of the meal:
“You aren’t taking rice tonight?”
“Thanks no. Saw the old lady picking ’em out this noon.”
“That’s nothing. I saw the old man picking ’em out of the beans yesterday.”
But why should people come to war if they are going to be so squeamish?
A few days ago one rash soul among us conceived a hankering for salad. She went to Madame and, being ignorant of the French word, demanded simply.
“_Avez-vous_ lettice?”
Madame shook her head uncomprehending, but finally as the words were repeated a light dawned.
“_Ah oui, oui, oui!_”
She turned and hurried upstairs, descending triumphantly a moment later with a large bundle of old letters! In just what form she expected us to have them served I have not yet been able to ascertain.
The mess-room is so crowded that to reach a seat often requires considerable manœuvering. In one corner stands an ancient dressmaker’s dummy—by popular vote awarded as sweetheart to the most bashful man at table; in the corner opposite is the bed of Madame and Monsieur. The men who get up for early breakfast, swallow their bread and jam and coffee with Monsieur watching from his couch of ease. Today Madame was indisposed and when we came to supper we found that she had retired already. All through the meal she lay there, under the red feather-bed, looking like a dingy, weazened old corpse, staring at the ceiling, her mouth wide open.
For the last few days we have had a visiting clergyman with us. To all appearances a meek and long-suffering little man, he has been giving special revivalistic discourses at the huts and eating at our mess. This morning he was asked to say grace. In the middle of a long and earnest exhortation I was startled to hear these words: “Oh Lord, Thou knowest we are apt to grow lean and to starve in Thy service!” I fairly had to stuff one of the one franc canteen handkerchiefs, which serve as napkins at the mess, into my mouth to keep from laughing.
Bourmont, December 12.
In Paris a man who lectured to us said: “Get the fellows who have influence with you, and you can swing the crowd.” Sometimes I think that if Pat were our enemy instead of our friend we might almost as well shut up the hut. For Pat the sharp-shooter, Pat the dare-devil, Pat, who in company phrase “has Harry Lauder and George Cohen stopped in a hundred places,” Pat the happy-go-lucky adventurer is one of the leading spirits in Company A. He has served, it seems, already in the war with the Canadian army.
“But how did you get out of it?” I asked.
Whereupon Pat regaled me with a wonderful rigmarole involving an extraordinary case—his own—of shell-shock out of which I could make neither head nor tail. Later, from one of the Secretaries who had been at Saint Thiebault before I came, I learned the truth. When America had declared war, Pat had deserted from the Canadian in order to enlist in the American army. Pat had showed him a letter from one of his old-time friends; it ended:
“Of course I wouldn’t think of splitting on an old pal like you, Pat, but I do need twenty dollars like hell.”
“What did you do?” asked the Secretary.
“Sure an’ I sent him the money,” grinned Pat.
Shortly after I first became acquainted with him, Pat, who is naturally gallant, with a tongue inclined to blarney, extracted a promise from me. Some day, after the war, if we should happen to meet, say, strolling down Fifth Avenue, Pat “dressed in a nice blue serge suit” is going to “take me away from the other feller” and take me out to dinner. It was after solemly pledging my word to this agreement that I learned that Pat had formerly been a saloon keeper and had had an extensive police-court record. Immediately I began to hope that Pat would forget that post-war party, but not he. Instead, he is constantly reminding me of it, always before an audience, dwelling on it and elaborating it, until now I find it has grown from a mere dinner, to dinner, the theatre and a dance!
Lithe, wiry, lean-faced with close-cropped hair, pale blue gimlet eyes and an almost unvarying expression of intense seriousness on his face, Pat, when present, is the life of the hut. Forever at his clowning, you would never dream from his demeanour that Pat’s domestic affairs are in a state little short of catastrophic. His wife, according to her photograph a handsome, sullen, passionate type, half Mexican, ran away about a year ago, taking with her all his money that happened to be handy, together with his new automobile. Encountering some of Pat’s friends, she had explained her apparently care-free single state by telling them that Pat was dead. Now she has discovered that Pat is in France, she is all for reconciliation. She has written him a letter in which she addresses him as her dear husband about six times to each sheet, informing him that she needs money, and inquiring of him what he wished her to do with his clothes.
“What did you answer?” I asked, for Pat, who must always share his correspondence, had shown me the letter.
“I told her,” grinned Pat, “she cu’d keep the clothes and maybe she’d find another man to fit ’em.”
But there is another and more serious side to the matter. It seems that the lady in the case has written to the Captain of A Company, requesting him to forward a large proportion of Pat’s pay to his deserving and indigent wife. Whether or not this will be done is still uncertain. Pat refuses to discuss the possibilities, but from the glint in his eyes I have a premonition that if next pay day Pat finds any considerable deduction made from his pay, that that night one wild Irishman will run amuck in Saint Thiebault.
Occasionally in the midst of Pat’s racy discourses I overhear things not meant for my ears, such as his remarking how in Rochester once he “went on a seven day’s pickle in company with a female dreadnut.” But usually he is very careful to only “pull gentle stuff” in my hearing. The other day he delivered himself of a wonderful dissertation on the deceitfulness of pious people, ending with this gem;
“So whenever I see one of these guys comin’ towards me with a gold crown on his bean, looking’ as if he couldn’t sin if he had to, why I nip tight on to my pocketbook and I cross to the other side of the street!”
Today Pat came into the canteen with a newspaper clipping and a letter to show me. The letter was from the Chief of Police of K——, one of the many cities in which Pat has resided during his short but crowded life, the clipping from the K—— Daily Sheet. The clipping was comprised of a letter which Pat had written to the Chief of Police giving in humorous phrase his version of life in France and an accompanying paragraph stating that though the writer had given the police force no little anxiety during his residence in K——, still he had been in spite of all, a good-hearted and likable rascal, and now that he had gone to war for his country, bygones should be bygones and K—— must be proud of him. The letter from the Chief was in much the same vein.
“Yes,” ruminated Pat; “I kept the old feller pretty busy, though me an’ him were friends just the same. But it sure would get the old man’s goat, just after he’d had me up and fined me, to come home and see me settin’ at his dinner-table alongside of his pretty daughter.”
Bourmont, December 14.
Because it took too much time right in the most important part of the day to climb Bourmont Hill for mess at night, I have arranged to take my suppers with two little old ladies here in Saint Thiebault. The suppers are to consist of a bowl of cocoa and a slice of bread with jam. The little ladies supply the bread and milk for the cocoa and I supply the rest, paying them one franc a day.
At half-past five I put on my things, light my little candle-lantern and set forth. The boys, coming in after mess, will be crowding the hut; a chorus of anxious voices queries.
“You’re comin’ back sure, ain’t you?”
And, “What time is that hot chocolate goin’ to be ready?”
I pick my way down the slippery duck-boards to the highway. Trudging along the muddy road, friendly voices hail me from the dark. I am known by the little light I carry. At number two Rue Dieu I rap and enter, trying desperately to leave some of the mud from my boots on the door-step, for in this land of wooden shoes scrapers are as unknown as they are unnecessary. Once inside I have to fairly strain my eyes in order to be able to see anything, for all the light in the room is supplied by the embers on the hearth and one tiny gasolene lamp with a flame not much bigger than the point of a lead pencil. Kerosene is unobtainable for civilian use; the price of candles is prohibitive.
“_C’est la guerre. Cest la misère_,” say the little old ladies. “One must sit in the dark—“_Cest triste comme ça._”
My candle doubles the illumination, yet in spite of that, so strong is the instinct for economy, they will not rest easy until they have blown it out.
The little old ladies are cousins. The elder of the two, “Madame,” is lame and has snow-white hair. She sits by the fire always in the self-same spot. The younger, “Mademoiselle,” is a tiny dwarfish creature with a back that is not quite straight. Over her dark dress she wears a jaunty little scarlet apron sewn with black polka dots. I am grateful for that apron; it makes the one bit of color in the sombre room.
I sit in front of the fire at the round table and sip my chocolate. The table has an oil-cloth cover on which is printed a map of France, so as I eat my supper I can take a lesson in geography. It is a pre-war tablecloth I fancy; over at one edge shows a slice of Germany. The little old ladies point to that side of the table with scorn, “_Les sales Bodies sont là!_” they explain.
I wonder that it doesn’t give them heart-burn to look down and see the captive and devastated districts of France lying beneath their tea cups. Think of setting your salt-cellar on the city of Lille or your mustard pot on the sacred citadel of Verdun!
As I sup I endeavour to converse politely, but as my French is little more than camouflage, this is a dubious proceeding. Whenever I prove particularly stupid, out of the corner of my eye I catch Madame shaking her old head at Mademoiselle despairingly.
“_Elle ne comprend pas!_” she murmurs sotto voce, pityingly; “_elle ne comprend pas!_”
At odd times they turn an honest penny by doing a little sewing for the villagers. But life is very difficult these days: the prices of everything have gone so high. Why, wooden shoes that cost five francs before the war now fetch fifteen!
Tonight I noticed an item in a Parisian Journal lying by my plate. It was to the effect that at the Madeleine that day Mlle. X had married Lieut. Z., a veteran of the war who had lost both arms and both legs. I showed it to the little ladies.
“_Ah oui!_” sighed Mademoiselle with a shiver. “_Elle a beaucoup de courage, celle-là!_”
And Madame shook her white head and echoed. “_Oui, elle a beaucoup de courage!_”
Upstairs an American officer is billeted. I fancy his presence supplies a certain dash of romance to the little old ladies’ lives. The Americans are nice, they say, and make little noise in the village; when the Russians were here it was different.
“It will be lonely when the Americans are gone,” sighs Mademoiselle. “The houses will seem empty.”
Bourmont, December 18.
Yesterday I explored the top of Bourmont Hill. It is here that the Quality Folk live, and here are some stately old houses with beautiful carved doorways and even an occasional gargoyle. Here too the general commanding the Division lives, and I have often observed with glee corpulent colonels and rotund majors puffing and blowing and growing red in the face as they climbed the hill to Headquarters. At the top of the hill there are two churches. Some two weeks ago, it is whispered, a spy was caught signaling from the tower of Notre Dame. His signals, it is said, were flashed to another spy stationed on the hills to the east, who in turn sent the messages on to the lines. The Curé of Notre Dame is being held under suspicion of complicity.
From Notre Dame an avenue bordered by magnificent old trees sweeps around to the Calvary, a tall wooden cross surmounting a curious structure of rough stone, ringed about with shallow steps—the Mecca of many pilgrimages. Beyond the Calvary one comes to the Mystery of Bourmont. A faded sign declares _Défense d’éntrée_, but one looks the other way and slips by. For once past the gate you are in an atmosphere of enchantment. No one seems to know just what it is, nor how it came about; I can get no intelligent explanation from Madame or Monsieur. To me it seems like the forgotten playground of an old mad king in some fantastic legend. For here among the trees are stone stairs, walls and terraces, and, cut in the curiously cleft rocks, are niches and tunnelled passage-ways, all mantled over now with green moss and ivy, the whole making one think of a dream garden out of Mæterlinck.
Coming down Bourmont Hill afterwards I was startled by the beating of a drum; looking back I saw a woman, bare-headed, her blue apron fluttering in the wind, descending the street after me; from her shoulders was slung the drum which she was beating with a martial vim. It was the town-crier, _le tambour_ as the French put it. Arrived at an appropriate spot, she stopped, pulled out a paper, cried “_Avis!_” and began to read in a rapid high official monotone. The wash-house was to be closed between two and four o’clock the following afternoon on account of the new water system the Americans were installing. Certain requisitions of grain were to be levied.... The villagers were notified to call at the Mayory for their bread cards, without which, after such a date, no bread could be obtained.... One or two women came to the doors of the houses and listened. She took no notice of them. The reading over, she rolled the paper up with a quick decisive gesture, and resumed her march, the sharp rub-a-dub-dub of her drum pursuing me all the way to Saint Thiebault.
Of late the air has become fairly vibrant with disquieting rumours: one does not know what to believe, what to reject.
The Germans are massing for a gigantic drive on Nancy. In three weeks, some say, the offensive is to begin; three days, say others. Nancy is to be another Verdun. If they break through they will pass this way. The American troops are being withdrawn from this neighborhood: any day the order may come for us to leave. At Paris the political situation is dark. Some people even fear a popular uprising against the government. I hinted at this to Monsieur, he shook his old head hopelessly. But yes, things were in a bad way. Now if France only had _Veelson_ at her head! France and _Veelson_! His gesture indicated the grandeur of such a contingency. As it was, France lacked a leader. And underneath all this runs another rumour, still darker, still more disquieting. The French, the gallant French, they say, are “laying down.” They are ready to make peace at any price. They are played out, sick to death of it all!
“Forty-two months in the trenches!” cried a sergeant _en-permission_ last night; “It is enough! I am through. Let the Americans do it!”
And this feeling, they tell us, is wide-spread. The people see our soldiers day after day, in the training camps, inactive. “What are they here for?” they are asking. “Why don’t they fight? Are they going to wait until it is all over?”
Will our soldiers, half-trained as they are, and a mere handful, be forced, to satisfy them, into the trenches?
The letters begin not with a declaration of war but with a prayer answered: the author's village has red roofs. This small, personal detail—a preference for rose-colored tiles over grey—sets the tone for a record that is less about grand strategy and more about the texture of daily life behind the lines. The foreword explains that these letters were never mailed because the censor sat opposite the writer at the mess table; instead, they were kept under lock and key, a private chronicle of one girl's experience with the American Expeditionary Forces.
The opening chapter, dated November 24, 1917, describes Bourmont as a city set upon a hill so steep that motor vehicles must take a roundabout route. Already, the author includes a local anecdote: an engineer bribed a Frenchman with a fifty-franc note to wheel him to the summit in a wheelbarrow. This blend of observation and offhand storytelling characterizes the entire work.
The Censor's Shadow
The book's title promises uncensored content, and the foreword makes the censorship dilemma explicit. The author writes that all letters mailed from France passed under the eyes of the Censor, who was likely a young man from the mess table. This meant one could not say the things one could, nor could one say the things one would. Her solution was to write freely and keep the letters until she could deliver them in person.
This framing shapes every page. The reader is invited into a space where the writer is unguarded, yet the very existence of the letters as a published book—after the war—implies that some self-censorship may remain. The tension between candor and discretion is a constant undercurrent, visible in the author's willingness to name frustrations (such as the propaganda film) while still maintaining a cheerful, resilient tone.
Camouflage and Credulity
A striking passage from July 10 describes the camp stopping work to pose for a propaganda film titled America's Answer to the Hun. The author calls these “camouflage pictures,” noting that the peaceful valley where a narrow-gauge railway is being built will masquerade as a battlefield. Engineers dressed as infantry march across the landscape amid fake shrapnel. She then recounts seeing a newspaper photograph of American boys playing baseball on a field where shells fall daily—a field she identifies as the Y. athletic field at Gondrecourt, where the only shells were peanut shells.
This moment crystallizes a recurring theme: the gap between official representation and lived reality. The author wonders if she will ever recover her pre-war faith in newspapers, photographs, and movies. The passage is not merely cynical; it is a precise observation of how war is packaged for home consumption.
Railroads, Rations, and Resentment
The letters are rich with technical details about the narrow-gauge railway and the friction between American and French railroad practices. One engineer explains that French crews are allowed a certain amount of coal and oil; any savings are reimbursed. American crews, attached to the French, saved far more than the French could, leading the French to reduce coal quality from half dust to all dust. Yet the Americans still beat them at saving. Then General Pershing ruled that they were not there to make money off the French, ending the practice.
This anecdote reveals the everyday economics of war and the resentment it breeds. The author does not editorialize heavily; she lets the engineer's voice carry the complaint. The result is a layered portrait of cooperation and competition among allies, far from the unified front of official propaganda.
These letters offer a view of the Great War from a canteen counter, where the concerns are not battles but billets, not strategy but supplies. The author's eye for the absurd—a wheelbarrow ride up a hill, a propaganda film shot in a peaceful valley—keeps the narrative grounded in the particular. Readers should approach this book as a diary of small moments, not a history of campaigns, and listen for the voice of a woman who wrote what she saw, even if she had to wait to share it.
The rain kept pace with those letters, that canteen girl’s steady voice finding warmth in ruined villages and dry jokes about railroad disputes. Her unsent words made me think of other people’s private affection for books, the way we shelve them like confessions. Later, I found myself reaching for The Book-Lovers' Anthology — Context and Discussion, and it felt like the same quiet companionship, just arranged differently.
Evelyn Garcia
1 week agoCamila Miller
1 month agoMichael Hall
3 weeks ago-
Kelly Sanchez - 1 month ago
{'positive': "An authentic and deeply moving account of a young woman's experiences as a canteen girl during the First World War. The letters are unvarnished and vivid, capturing both the horror and the humanity of war. The author's bravery, humor, and compassion shine through, offering a unique female perspective on a historical period often dominated by male voices. A must-read for history buffs.", 'neutral': "The letters provide a heartfelt and personal glimpse into a lesser-known aspect of WWI history, and the narrator's voice is engaging. However, the book lacks broader historical context and the editing is minimal, so readers may find themselves researching events and places mentioned. Still, it's a valuable primary source with genuine emotional impact.", 'negative': 'Though the letters are historically interesting, the writing is often unstructured and repetitive. The lack of an editorial hand means the reader is inundated with mundane details, and the absence of historical context or annotations is frustrating. It reads more like an unprocessed diary than a polished memoir, which may deter those seeking a coherent narrative.'}
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.
Matthew Martin
4 weeks ago